Movie Reviews

You are currently browsing the archive for the Movie Reviews category.

So last Friday afternoon my sisters and I went to see the newest film in the Twilight saga, New Moon.  Why would a 32-year-old woman and her adult sisters would go see this movie?   There are three reasons:

pattinson1.  Twilight is a huge cultural phenomenon, and to avoid seeing this movie is to ignore the obsession of an entire generation.  Also, years of jokes and parodies which you won’t get because you skipped it.

2.  These movies are a laugh riot.  I mean, unintentional, but they’re hilarious.  Much more funny than most comedies.

3.  Robert Pattinson is pretty hot.

So New Moon.

I was going to write a review and be hilarious at the expense of this movie, but you’ll probably see it, and the humour implicit in Italian vampires who don’t wear any socks and teenage werewolves who never wear shirts will be clear to you.  Instead I’m going to talk directly to the parents of the teens and pre-teens who are going to see this film.

Firstly, don’t fool yourself: this series is not about abstinence.  It’s about sex.  Lots of it.  In the near future.  The whole series is designed to get the readers wound up, essentially, into a dreamy, inexperienced sexual frenzy.  That’s how they sell merchandise.  It’s not rocket science.

There’s probably no way you can avoid having your kid see any of the movies from this series unless you’re raising a socially maladjusted freak.  By hook or by crook, even if you forbid your kid from seeing this film, they’ll find a way.  When they’re older they will probably also get into your liquor cabinet.  So don’t go through all the drama of making these films or books forbidden fruit; you’ve got bigger fish to fry.  Take them to see it.  It’s really not worth fighting about.

But when the film is done, by god, sit them down and have a conversation. Read the rest of this entry »

Watchmen

Anyway. Watchmen.

Let me start by saying I’m not a purist; I’ve read the book, felt it was very good, know it’s very important. It was not, and will never be, one of my favourites for pounds of reasons, but that’s just personal taste, nothing else.

So I was excited, initially, to see the trailers for this movie. No Ben Affeck in spandex to make up for the lack of household-name super heroes. The visuals looked right; they didn’t look like they were reaching beyond the coolness of the concepts, or going too silly with the Eighties-ness. I held back hope, because I figure lots of cool-looking movies also suck cock. So I went in without any real expectation, and purposely didn’t re-read the book.

I went to see it alone, partially because I’ve been ill and missed the times when friends were going, partially because I wanted to really feel out my own opinion of this one, uncoloured by what my intelligent and critical friends have to say. And I have to say, as someone whose not a particular fan of the book itself and doesn’t remember the plot very faithfully, that I quite liked it. It didn’t blow my mind, or surprise me in any way. It also didn’t greatly disappoint. It walked a fine balance, and in my opinion succeeded in communicating some of the ideas of the book without alienating a non-nerd audience, and that’s some very diffcult ground to tread.

But dude, whomever chose that soundtrack has got to die. It made me want to punch Leonard Cohen. And what was with the Simon and Garfunkel? Jesus Christ! It made no sense, was utterly distracting, and didn’t serve to set the scenes at all. We’re neither close enough to the 80s, nor far enough away, that those songs are going to take most people to that time and place. They were jarring and silly.

The sex scene between Silk Spectre and Nite Owl (yes, II) was uncomfortably lame. You’ve probably all heard my thoughts about sex scenes in movies/books, but I’ll share them again. My ideal sex scene is one where the lovers passionately embrace, and then we cut to the hours later part. Sex scenes never send the plot forward, and watching people have sex isn’t any fun unless it’s porn, in which case, I don’t want to be watching it in a theatre full of strangers unless I’ve gone to that theatre for that particular purpose. 95% of sex scenes are boooooorrrrring. There’s no character development. Two animals writhe around making silly faces for a bit, then the plot gets to start again.

And none of you can tell me that you didn’tfi nd the next scene more sexually arousing and have any hope of sounding rational. Silk Spectre and Nite Owl were a million times more stimulating to watch while kicking prison ass than at any other point in the movie. It was totally backwards. I know that once you get Rorschach on board, sexy time is over, but jeez louise. I pulled out my iPod and checked for a wireless signal during that damned sex scene. Snoresville.

Um, and as much-discussed, Doctor Manhattan’s wang was dangling all over the place. I particularly appreciated the multiple-wang shots as a fine and subtle piece of comedy. And while I’m appreciating those, I’m going to let you in on another secret of filmmaking: full frontal lady? Sex. Full frontal male? Comedy. Mother Nature endowed you gentlemen with a very useful piece of equipment there, but certainly an unlovely one. Censors will pretend that they don’t like showing wang because gasp! Exposed sex-parts! But really, it’s because the people initially drawing up these rules were men who were particularly concerned with propriety, and couldn’t stand the thought of looking ridiculous. And look ridiculous Doc Manhood does.

If he wasn’t already y’know, blue and disassociated from humanity, he might care.

For me, Rorschach stole the show, both with his mask and without, and I thought Ozymandius was particularly well-played. I found the ending depressing and ominous, because that’s the kind of thing I fi nd depressing and ominous. I know it’s not as dark as the book, but I can’t really remember how the book ends. I’m glad they left out the Black Freighter. I wasn’t able to imagine how they’d make it t anyway. I walked home with my mind buzzing and a little excitement in my belly, and that’s all I can ask.

Hmmm, hard to rate this one. I’m-a gonna give it 3 forks. That music sucked, and the cover at the end by My Chemical Romance made want to punch someone again. And that’s worth three forks.

I just watched The Reader. I’m surprised it got made, but I guess the further away from WWII we get, the more people are willing to see Nazis as humans (as long as not played by Tom Cruise). It’s an excellent movie, as I’m sure you’ve heard. Kate Winslet slams that mother out of the park, completely deserves the Academy award. Ralph Fiennes was also very good. It seems slow, and you’re like okay, yeah, romance, stuff , whatever and then all of a sudden it builds to this peak and holy fuck, you’re bawling. 2 forks. I highly recommend it; the forks are mostly for re-treading the tired old Nazi turf, but they did it in such a fresh way I don’t have the heart to really snipe at them about it.

I also watched Changeling. Angelina was decent; I’ve enjoyed her more in other things, for certain. She really looks the part. This movie has an really interesting back story, some really good, strong characters drawn from real life, some seriously good actors, and THE LAMEST MOST SENTIMENTAL DIRECTOR OF ALL TIME LADIES AND GENTLEMEN I GIVE YOU CLINT EASTWOOD. Can anyone give me a reason, beyond that he’s a famous guy, for why Clint Eastwood is allowed to direct movies? All his fi lms plod along, lingering over fallen teddy bears and shit when good artists are labouring away trying to make you feel something for the characters. Eastwood would’ve fi lmed it all in a dreamy haze if he could’ve. This movie is about the mother of a kid abducted by a seriously twisted serial killer in the 20s; it should have been completely fascinating. Instead it was Snoresville. This is a thriller for your grandma, but it didn’t so much as warm my frikken’ heart. Damn you, Clint. 8 forks. We all know you tried, Angelina.

Speedracer

I just watched Speedracer.

Okay, when I saw my first trailer for this movie, about a gazillion years ago, I thought “Holy fuck, that looks amazing. I can’t wait!” Cool eff ects, some nice stylized stu ff, looked like overall beautiful production design.

Then, I saw commercials on TV. Suddenly there’s a fat kid and a monkey. Suddenly it looks like an unbearably stupid kids movie. Screw you, Matrix guys, I think. I’m not seeing that crap.

And that’s pretty much my last thought about it until Sam reminded me of it a few days ago.

And holy! Freakin’ ! Dang!

Because (leaving out the fat kid and the monkey) this is a freakin’ terriffc movie.  It’s too bad the ad campaign killed it dead, because this would have been just glorious to see in a theatre. The visual e ffects, the lighting, the stylization, and the goddamned movement of the cars were all so beautiful I can’t believe I didn’t get to see it huge. I think I would’ve cried. The light trails in the ice caves! The hand-to-hand combat in the snow! The sand billowing behind the cars! The lighting in the ninja fight! The beautiful bit in the last race where the background billows like exhaust clouds, oh my god, and the part right at the end where Speed pulls in to the red checkered finish! It was like the absolute best of animated shows and comic books crossed with the most beautiful live action production; it was so fucking appropriate and sensitively handled. It blew my mind. If any movie was going to change filmmaking, this one is ‘way more worthy than The Matrix.

Yeah, yeah, you can yell at me about that assertion in the comments.

Oh fuck, the editing was sooooo good. The argument between Trixie and Speed while they’re racing the Casa Christo is so beautifully edited; you’re never out of the action, and still the argument is perfectly paced, and it heightens the tension by giving you a break from the main business. It’s so note-perfect.

Issues: They threw my feminist critic brain a bone and had a few chicks racing cars and being something other than a helpless dishrag, but it barely passes muster – whatever the original story was like, you can’t really get away without a protagonist chick in a movie like this anymore (see the new Bond films).

Christina Ricci (who should still maybe eat a sandwich) is great, but I could’ve used more from her. When she fi nally grows a pair about halfway through the movie, I had started really rolling my eyes about the lack of women.

Similarly, the Asian characters are duplicitous (okay, not Horuko, but I really liked Taejo and wanted him to be a good guy), which felt jerky, the evil guy is German (which seemed silly – Germans?! Not threatening. Nice Commodore 64 reference, though), and there are others that are less important to the plot. It’s honestly ‘way too bigoted for a film released in 2008. For me, anyway. The stereotypes aren’t amusing, add nothing to the plot, and are essentially meaningless except for being mean-spirited and for me, the only place the production design/script feels lazy and phoned-in.

And I can’t, though I wish I could, purge from my memory the lame lameness of that stupid kid and the stupid monkey. I know that they were trying to make a family movie (kiss of goddamn death, blech), but it didn’t work, and if you edit out all those scenes you have a fucking amazing movie. If, like me, you can even ignore Tom Cruise in The Last Samurai, you may be able to work around the stupidity, but if not, it might seriously impair your enjoyment.

But try – try to ignore that crap, and watch those unbelievable race scenes, and if you’re anything like me you’ll have that familiar sense of wonder that you had the first time you watched the Light Cycle sequences in Tron. Yessir; you can yell at me about that in the comments too. I don’t care. Tears welled up in my eyes at one point. Over an e ffect. It was awesome.

Um, plot? Yeah, there is one, and it’s serviceable. Y’know. There’s villains and love and piranhas, and it does the trick. Since the trick is to deliver awesome and mind-blowingly beautiful visuals and e ffects.

So, in answer to the oft-asked question “Does Candace like anything?” the answer is “Yes. I like Speed Racer.”
And also Tron.
And anyone who doesn’t is a total neener-head.

It’s a hard one to rate; I give the kid with the monkey 10 forks, and the rest of the movie 2 forks (those forks are for relying on outmoded stereotypes for weak sight gags that add nothing to an otherwise gorgeous movie).

Rent it and watch it on the biggest screen you can find.

Oooh, I watched Zac and Miri Make A Porno tonight, and despite the fact that everyone told me it was kinda einh, I found it really enjoyable. When it comes to RomComs (for which I have a notorious weakness), most are the worst crap of all time and perpetuate a bunch of stereotypes that make me want to scream.

But this one is touchingly romantic (yes it is!), pretty realistic (once you accept the premise), and funny enough to have made me laugh many times. Also, enough dick jokes to make your boyfriend want to watch it with you despite the romance. And the guy who plays Zack is cute enough that I could imagine myself wanting to date him (unlike, let’s say, Drew Carey), while not being so cute that you couldn’t imagine him being real (like Pierce Brosnin). 1 fork. Which is like, -300 forks for a RomCom, but my system doesn’t work that way.

Australia

Just came back from seeing Australia. Now, I heart Hugh Jackman, I heart Baz Luhrmann, am midling-to-cold on Australia itself, and I think Nicole Kidman is super-pretty and I wish I had her clothes, but like, in my size. And I quite liked this movie. Did it hit the epicness that Baz was shooting for? No, unfortunately. But it sure did some nice things on the way to not hitting the mark.

If, like me, you’re a total lighting junkie, huge swathes of the movie are like porn.

If, like me, you have a connoisseurs appreciation of shirtless Hugh Jackman, this movie is not like porn (only shirtless once, though he is shirtless + wet, which kinda counts as 1 and a half).

So you can see how I might be conflicted.

The story is an unlikely one, where, in 1939 a blonde British aristocrat is somehow able to set aside her class-consciousness and her racism in like, twenty minutes and then becomes some kind of race and class heroine. In the process, we learn valuable lessons, like that anyone who isn’t white is magic, everyone in Australia has really white teeth, and that Hugh Jackman only uses moisturizer when he’s in Darwin.

The sets, – hoo golly – lighting, shots and visual e ffects are mostly created to simulate a really beautiful old fi lm style, though occasionally some of it drops off , which seems a little visually disjointed. The costumes are terriffc. The villains are a sweater-vest wearin’ gang of do-no-goods, the leader of whom is kinda hot in a surly, mustachioed way.

Corniness seeps in through Miss Kidman’s performance, and the constantly-repeated motif of ‘Somewhere Over the Rainbow’ and The Wizard of Oz – but I’ll tell ya now that the corniness gets compounded the earlier you key in that Oz is what they call Australia these days. Baz, you’re hurting me. Sometimes Hugh pulls a Wolverine pose that cracks me up, and some of the lines ought to have been strangled at birth. The kid narrator shut up about 5 minutes after he ought to have, and that could’ve been a total disaster for the film if they hadn’t reined it in.

I called pretty much every good-guy death, which was telegraphed for miles, and in fact there’s very little about this movie that isn’t completely predictable.

But, as you can probably tell, I enjoyed the fuck out of it, probably because it combines the best of two worlds: a movie with lots of bad stuff to mock, and with lots of good stuff to get excited about.

Like I say, the lighting was (mostly) like porn to me.

I’m going to give it 2 forks, which is pretty good for me. I’m totally finished seeing how a brave, independently-minded white person like, is the great fucking white hope and has absolutely no regrettable opinions. But, overlooking that bit (the soft-focus-history bit), and the cheesy bits, it’s a very entertaining movie that didn’t feel like it was a hundred hours long, despite its length. It’s not Baz Luhrman’s best fi lm – weirdly, I think he’s been getting worse, though Baz Luhrman at his worst is still a hell of a lot better than you or I on a good day. It’s more focused than Moulin Rouge (which was a bit of a mess, though a pretty one), more polished than Strictly Ballroom, and I’m totally not going to compare it to R+J because the writer gave him an edge (and Claire Danes took that edge away, via criminal lameness).

Am I going to say it? Yes, yes I am: It’s no Iron Man.

Ouch, Baz!

« Older entries